The 90% Problem: Why Specialty Practices Over-Invest in Bottom-Funnel Paid Search

BETAPrivate preview — this site is actively being built.
LinkedIn — Matt Lee May 08, 2026
Read Full Article →
AI-Generated Summary

Specialty healthcare practices typically allocate 90% of paid media spend to high-intent, bottom-of-funnel searches — terms like “knee surgeon near me” or “carpal tunnel specialist” — where 10 competitors bid on the same click. By the time a patient executes that search, the choice to see a specialist is already made; what remains is which practice wins the auction. The real opportunity is mid-funnel: reaching patients in the six-month window before they know they need care. MD Anderson’s “Where You Go First Matters” campaign is the benchmark — buying into the consideration set before pain starts, not bidding for the hand-raise after it does. Orthopedic, cardiology, and dermatology groups running 90/10 bottom-heavy media mixes are sustaining a bidding war, not building a durable patient acquisition engine.

Why It Matters

For PE-backed multi-site operators, a 90/10 bottom-funnel media split means permanently elevated CAC with no brand moat to show for it. Reallocating 20–30% of media spend toward mid-funnel brand awareness — before patients know they need care — creates a consideration-set advantage competitors cannot replicate through bidding alone.

specialty healthcare marketing paid media strategy mid-funnel marketing patient acquisition brand awareness consideration set healthcare advertising

While we aim to share useful and relevant resources, we do not guarantee the accuracy of content on this site or any external links. Views and opinions expressed in referenced content do not necessarily reflect those of Healthcare Growth Strategies.

Similar Posts