Beyond Generational Labels: New Approaches to Older-Younger Conflict at Work

Bypaulgruensfelder
ASHHRA Exchange April 7, 2026
Read Full Article →
AI-Generated Summary

Healthcare workplaces increasingly face conflict between older and younger employees, worsened by generational labeling that introduces age bias rather than resolving tension. This article from ASHHRA Exchange argues that categorizing team members by generation—Boomer, Gen X, Millennial, Gen Z—creates harmful microaggressions and stereotypes that damage belonging and credibility. The author, an employee experience advisor at Marshfield Clinic–Sanford Health, proposes a shift toward personality-based frameworks to address conflict more effectively. Left unaddressed, intergenerational friction can escalate from misunderstanding to grievance, disengagement, or termination. A related ASHHRA session offers practical reframing strategies and tools for HR and operations leaders managing multigenerational teams.

Why It Matters

As staffing pressure persists, leaders managing multigenerational workforces can’t afford conflict that escalates to grievances or turnover. Moving from generational labels to personality-based approaches gives HR and operations teams a more accurate, legally defensible framework for resolving tension—and a cleaner path to building cohesive, high-functioning teams.

intergenerational conflict employee experience workplace culture conflict management HR leadership multigenerational workforce team retention

While we aim to share useful and relevant resources, we do not guarantee the accuracy of content on this site or any external links. Views and opinions expressed in referenced content do not necessarily reflect those of Healthcare Growth Strategies.

Similar Posts

  • Patients Choose the Hospital Brand First: 53% Pick a System Before a Doctor

    Bypaulgruensfelder

    When patients face a new health issue, a majority now choose the hospital or system first: 53% select a hospital first or pick a hospital and physician simultaneously, according to a July 2026 U.S. News & World Report survey of 500 U.S. adults who arranged care in the past 24 months. Hospital brand loyalty runs deep enough that 20% would switch providers to receive care at their preferred hospital. U.S. News attributes the pull to perceived safety, technology, and coordinated care across a trusted system. The data lands as U.S. News prepares its 37th Best Hospitals rankings (Aug. 4, 2026), adding new state and metro specialty rankings.

  • Healthcare M&A Trends Q2 2026: PPM, Outpatient, and PE Scrutiny

    Bypaulgruensfelder

    Healthcare M&A stayed steady in Q2 2026, driven by consolidation, AI integration, and cross-sector deals despite intensifying scrutiny of PE-backed MSO arrangements. Physician practice management remained active, with enablement platforms like Privia Health offering an alternative to full-ownership roll-ups. Ascension closed its AMSURG acquisition to become the third-largest ambulatory surgery center platform. For-profit systems kept divesting non-core assets—CHS sold Crestwood Medical Center for $459 million and four Arkansas hospitals to Freeman Health, part of a $1.2 billion, nine-hospital divestiture plan. Home health, hospice, and behavioral health saw continued PE-backed roll-ups, while digital health and health IT capital concentrated around scaled, high-performing platforms amid tariff-driven volatility and antitrust pressure.

  • Commure Targets the 35–50% of Referrals That Never Convert

    Bypaulgruensfelder

    Between 35% and 50% of medical referrals never result in a completed specialist appointment, and those that do take 31 days on average — a gap Commure’s new Orchestrator platform aims to close by automating end-to-end referral management and patient intake. The AI platform replaces fax-based referral workflows, targets referral leakage, and cuts pre-visit administrative work such as authorization holds and manual hand-offs. Commure frames the economics plainly: every unconverted referral is both a patient lost to follow-up and revenue that never shows up on the books. The launch adds to a fast-growing category of AI tools aimed at the pre-visit workflow, where leakage and intake friction remain among the most measurable revenue drains for multi-site provider groups.

  • Select Medical Goes Private in $3.9B Welsh Carson-Led Deal

    Bypaulgruensfelder

    Select Medical Holdings completed a $3.9 billion take-private on July 1, 2026, led by its founders and private equity firm Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe at $16.50 per share — an 18% premium to its pre-announcement close. The Mechanicsburg, Pa. operator runs outpatient physical therapy (including NovaCare) across roughly 1,850 locations in 36 states, plus 104 long-term acute-care hospitals and 38 rehabilitation hospitals, with more than 45,000 employees and $5.5 billion in 2025 revenue. Management rolled equity alongside the sponsor, keeping operating leadership invested through the next value-creation cycle in post-acute and outpatient rehab.

  • Allina Health to Pay $12.5M to Settle Website Pixel Litigation

    Bypaulgruensfelder

    Allina Health System agreed to pay $12.5 million to resolve a consolidated class action over its use of website tracking pixels, one of the larger settlements in the ongoing healthcare pixel litigation wave. Plaintiffs alleged the tools disclosed personally identifiable information and protected health information to third parties including Meta and Google, in violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, the Minnesota Health Records Act, and state deceptive trade practices law. Allina denies wrongdoing. The fund splits into $10.3 million for patient portal, bill-pay, and scheduling users and $2.2 million for other patients, covering activity from September 2018 through May 2026.

  • Federal Court Strikes Down South Dakota Dental Advertising Restrictions

    Bypaulgruensfelder

    A federal court struck down South Dakota’s dental advertising restrictions, ruling that dentists may market bona fide credentials—including implant dentistry—even in areas the American Dental Association does not formally recognize as specialties. On July 20, 2026, U.S. District Judge Karen Schreier granted summary judgment to the American Academy of Implant Dentistry and Sioux Falls dentist Dr. Edward Kusek, and denied the South Dakota Board of Dentistry and Attorney General Marty Jackley. The plaintiffs argued the Board’s 2023 rules violated First Amendment commercial-speech protections. The decision tracks earlier AAID victories against the Texas, California, and Florida boards, reinforcing that truthful, non-misleading specialty advertising by dentists is constitutionally protected.