Deacon Associates Acquires 31 Hospice, Home Health Agencies From HCA Healthcare

Free tool
What might a practice like this be worth?

Turn adjusted EBITDA and a few practice details into a directional enterprise-value range with our Healthcare Practice Valuation Calculator. Educational and directional, and no email required.

Open the calculator →
HOSPICE NEWS June 24, 2026
Read Full Article →
AI-Generated Summary

Deacon Associates has agreed to acquire 31 home health and hospice agencies from HCA Healthcare, with hospice representing 23% of the divested assets across eight states. The deal, expected to close within roughly three months pending regulatory approval, extends a consolidation thread that traces back to HCA’s 2021 acquisition of an 80% stake in Brookdale Senior Living’s home health and hospice segment for $400 million. Deacon CEO Trey Crabb said the move reflects a deliberate strategy to scale: growing larger lets the company spread fixed costs over a bigger operating base while reimbursement rates decline and care delivery costs rise. Financial terms of the new transaction were not disclosed.

Why It Matters

Hospital systems are continuing to exit post-acute lines while specialized roll-ups absorb the volume, a clear signal for hospice and home health operators that scale and cost-spreading, not organic growth alone, are becoming the dominant playbook for surviving reimbursement pressure.

hospice M&A home health consolidation HCA Healthcare divestiture post-acute care strategy PE roll-up reimbursement pressure

While we aim to share useful and relevant resources, we do not guarantee the accuracy of content on this site or any external links. Views and opinions expressed in referenced content do not necessarily reflect those of Healthcare Growth Strategies.

Frequently asked questions

Why is HCA Healthcare selling off its hospice and home health agencies?

HCA Healthcare divested 31 home health and hospice agencies across eight states to Deacon Associates, with hospice representing 23% of the divested assets. The move continues HCA’s pullback from post-acute care after entering the space via its 2021, $400 million acquisition of an 80% stake in Brookdale Senior Living’s home health and hospice segment.

What is Deacon Associates’ strategy behind the HCA Healthcare acquisition?

Deacon Associates CEO Trey Crabb said the deal reflects a decision to ‘double down’ on home health and hospice by scaling up, spreading fixed costs over a larger operating base as reimbursement rates decline and care delivery costs climb. The acquisition is expected to close in about three months pending regulatory approval.

How big was the 2021 HCA-Brookdale home health and hospice deal?

HCA Healthcare acquired an 80% stake in Brookdale Senior Living’s home health and hospice services segment in 2021 for $400 million. Several assets from that earlier transaction are included among the 31 agencies now being divested to Deacon Associates.

Similar Posts

  • MGMA 2026: Only 47% of Medical Groups Report Rising Revenue as Costs Climb

    Medical practice revenue growth is stalling in 2026 even as costs keep climbing. MGMA’s June 30, 2026 poll found just 47% of medical groups reporting higher year-to-date revenue versus 2025, with 36% reporting a decline—narrowing the gainers’ lead from 26 points a year ago to only 11. Meanwhile 84% report higher operating costs. Two forces drive the squeeze: the 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule’s -2.5% work-RVU efficiency adjustment on 7,000+ procedural codes, and ACA marketplace erosion—effectuated enrollment fell to 19.2 million, roughly 3 million below 2025, as average deductibles jumped 37% to a record $3,786. MGMA urges practices to model Medicare impact by CPT code and refresh payer-mix projections now.

  • Jarrard 2026 Survey: Community Impact Drives Hospital Trust and Patient Choice

    Hospitals seen as strong community partners earn markedly higher consumer trust, advocacy, and preference, according to Jarrard’s 2026 Community Impact Survey — yet fewer than one-third of consumers strongly agree their local hospital is a good community partner. Consumers who do hold that view are 26 points more likely to trust the hospital to do the right thing, 37 points more likely to speak positively about or defend it, 33 points more likely to advocate for it on policy issues, and 24 points more likely to choose it when all else is equal (15 points more likely even when less convenient). Jarrard frames visible community impact as a business imperative tied directly to loyalty and choice.

  • KLAS 2026 RCM Suites Report: Deep Single-Vendor Adopters Collect More

    Healthcare organizations that run three or more revenue cycle modules from a single vendor — ‘deep adopters’ — report better cash collections and a lower cost to collect than those stitching together point solutions, according to KLAS Research’s 2026 Revenue Cycle Management Suites report. Waystar earned the highest overall grade, an ‘A,’ on the strength of strategic partnership, a cohesive UI across acquired modules, transparent bundled pricing, and high adoption of AI-generated appeals. The top drivers for going all-in with one RCM vendor were vendor consolidation (57%) and building a stronger strategic partnership (57%), followed by pricing (43%) and expanded functionality (41%). KLAS cautioned that no single vendor yet offers a fully mature, end-to-end platform without functional trade-offs.

  • Hospital Mergers as a Lifeline: What Actually Creates Value

    Hospital mergers are increasingly a survival move rather than a growth play, as roughly $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and ACA changes squeeze margins and raise uncompensated care. Independent and rural hospitals that lack capital for technology and service expansion are seeking larger partners, but stricter state regulatory reviews now threaten deal timelines — Oregon’s Santiam Hospital warned it could become insolvent by August 1 without an expedited merger. Optum Advisory’s Morgan Haines stresses that “the merger itself is never the value”; stabilization comes from post-close investments in technology, service-line redesign, operational improvements, and community partnerships. Leaders are urged to prioritize “speed-to-value.”

  • Why AI ROI Stalls: The Case for Disciplined Decisions

    AI initiatives often underdeliver because organizations never define which decisions AI should actually improve — a fixable focus problem, not a technology gap. Summit Partners’ Sharon Lin argues that generative AI has lowered the cost of analysis so dramatically that many teams now face “analysis paralysis at scale,” producing endless dashboards and scenarios while struggling to act. She warns against automating away interpretive, relational work — consultative sales, creative brainstorming, customer insight — where friction itself carries signal. The limiting factor in AI-enabled organizations is rarely access to insight or technology; it is the discipline to identify which decisions AI can genuinely improve and the willingness to protect space for human judgment.

  • Healthcare Payment Models Can’t Reimburse Clinical AI Yet — Here’s the Fix Being Built

    Today’s healthcare payment models — fee-for-service, pay-for-performance, and capitation — cannot properly reimburse providers for clinical AI, according to a new Peterson Health Technology Institute report drawn from spring 2026 convenings of health system, health plan, technology, investment, academic, and federal leaders. Because autonomous AI decouples value from clinician time, existing coverage rules and incentives fail to support the workflow changes adoption requires, and value-based providers struggle to attribute savings to a specific tool. The group proposed three design principles: pay only when AI demonstrably improves outcomes, cost, or access; price to clinical or economic value with safeguards like price ratcheting; and set adoption-stage rates that decline as evidence and scale grow. The AMA is developing CPT codes for autonomous clinical AI to build the billing infrastructure.